Syria: US sets up teams with Israel, Jordan, Turkey against chemical attack

Afbeelding

The United States last week began laying plans for the contingency of Syrian chemical warfare by setting up joint military, intelligence and medical working teams with Israel, Turkey and Jordan, all of which are feared under threat by Syrian president Bashar Assad, debkafile’s military sources report.

DEBKAfile, August 12, 2012

Photo: A baby in Tu Du Hospital suffering from the consequences of Agent Orange being dropped on Vietnam 30 years ago.

——-

Victims of American chemical weapons

As the United States is the most advanced industrial nation in world it was able to make full use of the latest developments in technology in its war against North Vietnam. B-52 bombers, that could fly at heights that prevented them being seen or heard, dropped 8 million tons of bombs on Vietnam between 1965 and 1973. This was over three times the amount of bombs dropped throughout the whole of the Second World War and worked out at approximately 300 tons for every man, woman and child living in Vietnam.

As well as explosive bombs the United States Air Force dropped a considerable number of incendiary devices. The most infamous of these was napalm, a mixture of petrol and a chemical thickner which produces a tough sticky gel that attaches itself to the skin. The igniting agent, white phosphorus, continues burning for a considerable amount of time. A reported three quarters of all napalm victims in Vietnam were burned through to the muscle and bone (fifth degree burns). The pain caused by the burning is so traumatic that it often causes death.

The US also made considerable use of anti-personnel bombs. The pineapple bomb was made up of 250 metal pellets inside a small canister. Gloria Emerson, a reporter in Vietnam, witnessed their use: “An American plane could drop a thousand pineapples over an area the size of four football fields. In a single air strike two hundred and fifty thousand pellets were spewed in a horizontal pattern over the land below, hitting everything on the ground.”

The United States also experimented with the use of plastic rather than metal needles and pellets in their antipersonnel bombs. The advantage of plastic was they could not be identified by X-Ray machines. Dropped on highly populated areas, antipersonnel bombs could severely disrupt the functioning of North Vietnam. It has been claimed that the major objective of the US bombing raids on North Vietnam was not to kill its 17 million population but to maim them. As was pointed out at the time, serious injury is more disruptive than death as people have to be employed to look after the injured where they only have to bury the dead.

One of the major problems of the US forces was the detection of the National Liberation Front hiding in the forests of Vietnam. In 1962, President John F. Kennedy approved Operation Ranch Hand. This involved the spraying of chemicals from the air in an attempt to destroy the National Liberation Front hiding places. In 1969 alone, Operation Ranch Hand destroyed 1,034,300 hectares of forest. Agent Orange, the chemical used in this defoliation programme not only destroyed trees but caused chromosomal damage in people.

Chemicals were also sprayed on crops. Between 1962 and 1969, 688,000 agricultural acres were sprayed with a chemical called Agent Blue. The aim of this exercise was to deny food to the NLF. However, research suggests that it was the civilian population who suffered most from the poor rice harvests that followed the spraying.

When a report appeared in the St. Louis Dispatch about the dropping of “poison” on North Vietnam the United States denied the herbicide they were using was a chemical weapon. It was claimed that Agent Orange and Agent Blue were harmless to humans and only had a short-lived impact on the environment.

This was disputed by international experts and 5,000 American scientists, including 17 Nobel prize winners and 129 members of the Academy of Sciences, signed a petition against chemical and biological weapons being used in Vietnam. However, it was not until 1974 that the United States government stopped using Agent Orange and Agent Blue.

During the war about 10% of Vietnam was intensively sprayed with 72 million litres of chemicals, of which 66% was Agent Orange. Some of this landed on their own troops and soon after the war ended veterans began complaining about serious health problems. There was also a high incidence of their children being born limbless or with Down’s syndrome and spina bifida. The veterans sued the defoliant manufacturers and this was settled out of court in 1984 by the payment of $180 million.

The TCCD dioxin used in Agent Orange seeped into the soil and water supply, and therefore into the food chain. In this way it passed from mother to foetus in the womb. In Vietnam the dioxide remains in the soil and is now damaging the health of the grandchildren of the war’s victims.

A report published in 2003 claimed that 650,000 people in Vietnam were still suffering from chronic conditions as a result of the chemicals dropped on the country during the war. Since the war the Vietnamese Red Cross has registered an estimated one million people disabled by Agent Orange. It is estimated that 500,000 people in Vietnam have died from the numerous health problems created by these chemical weapons.

http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/VNchemical.htm

Advertenties

Tags: , , , , , ,

Eén reactie to “Syria: US sets up teams with Israel, Jordan, Turkey against chemical attack”

  1. kruitvat Says:

    Threat of a chemical weapon false-flag attack on Syria real

    Media scoundrels specialize in distorting comments and meaning.

    They’re hyperbolic over Foreign Ministry spokesman Jihad Makdissi saying Syria would only use chemical weapons against external aggression.

    His message was clear. Distortion, misinterpretation, and willful lying about it followed. Inflammatory headlines blared. More on what Makdissi meant below.

    At the State Department’s daily press briefing, Victoria Nuland commented on Syria’s chemical weapons, saying: “Talk about using chemical weapons is horrific and chilling.” “Syria has a responsibility to the world (and) its own citizens to protect and safeguard those weapons.”

    “Any kind of loose talk just speaks to the kind of regime that we’re talking about.”

    “I think we’ve been absolutely clear where we stand on this issue, which is that any possible use of these kinds of weapons would be completely unacceptable.”

    “We’ve been making our position clear for many, many days now, and we’ve also been working with all of our allies and partners to monitor the situation, to compare information, and to send the same messages.”

    Syria “knows where we stand.” Asked about securing them, Nuland said “warnings that we have given with regard to these weapons have been absolutely clear.”

    Asked about warning regime opponents, she added nothing further. Asked also to comment on Washington’s position on a potential Israeli attack, she said “obviously I’m not going to walk into hypothetical scenarios.”

    “Like all countries in the neighborhood, it makes sense for there to be prudent planning for self-defense.”

    Reports suggest Washington and Israel discussed destroying Syria’s stockpiles. Both countries know where they’re held. Allegedly they’re in dozens of locations. Bombing them would unleash a firestorm of toxins. Everyone nearby would be harmed.

    The threat of a chemical weapon false flag attack blamed on Syria is real. On June 10, Russia Today headlined “Syrian rebels aim to use chemical weapons, blame Damascus – report,” saying: “Opposition fighters have chemical weapons. Libyan sources supplied them. Allegedly they’re planned for use against civilians. The scheme involves blaming Assad.”

    DamPress claims “the opposition group in possession of the weapons is being trained in its use inside Turkey. No further details on the alleged conspiracy are given.”

    “The Libyan stockpile of chemical weapons was a matter of great concern during last year’s civil war in the country. There were fears that they may end up in the hands of the terrorists and used elsewhere in the world.”

    Independent analysts also fear a possible US-led NATO/Free Syrian Army (FSA) false-flag chemical attack on Syrian civilians to be blamed on Assad.

    Doing so would provide Washington an easy way to circumvent Security Council authority to intervene militarily and enlist popular support for it.

    If harmful enough, it could be Syria’s 9/11. American strategists may find that scheme too tempting to pass up. Regime change is longstanding US policy.

    NATO and regional allies head closer to war. A casus belli remains to initiate it. The horror of chemical attack mass casualties looks perfect. Whether it’s planned or not remains to be seen. The possibility is real.

    Media War of Words
    On July 23, The New York Times headlined “Syria Threatens Chemical Attack on Foreign Force,” saying: “Syrian officials warned Monday that they would deploy chemical weapons against any foreign intervention….”

    “The warning came out of Damascus, veiled behind an assurance that the Syrian leadership would never use such weapons against its own citizens, describing chemical and biological arms as outside the bounds of the kind of guerrilla warfare being fought internally.”

    The Times cited CIA reports saying: “Syria has had a CW program for many years and has a stockpile of CW agents, which can be delivered by aerial bombs, ballistic missiles, and artillery rockets.”

    On July 24, Reuters headlined “After bloody week, West warns Syria on chemical arms,” saying: “Western states expressed alarm” after Syria acknowledged its capability for the first time. Makdissi said chemical weapons won’t be used against insurgents “regardless of (internal) developments.”

    “These weapons are stored and secured by Syrian military forces and under (their) direct supervision and will never be used unless Syria faces external aggression.”

    The Mossad-connected DEBKAfile (DF) published various reports hyping an alleged Syrian chemical weapons threat.

    It’s latest July 23 issue headlined “Syrian chemical threat targets Israel. Obama warns Assad against ‘tragic mistake,’ ” saying: Makdissi’s statement indicated “a direct threat (against) Israel.” On Sunday, Netanyahu said preventing Syria’s chemical weapons from “falling into the wrong hands” was key to Israel’s security.

    Defense Minister Ehud Barak ordered the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) to prepare possibly attacking their storage areas because “Israel cannot accept the transfer of advanced weapons from Syria to Lebanon.”

    Nothing, of course, suggests Assad plans this. Hyping the threat advances the ball for war.

    Guilty parties include US officials, Israeli ones, Britain’s Foreign Secretary William Hague, France’s Minister of Foreign Affairs Laurent Fabius, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, UN/Arab League Syria envoy Kofi Annan, and Human Rights Council High Commissioner Navanethem Pillay, among others.

    DF claim is part of the regime change campaign. It cited an unnamed Israeli official saying Assad “holds all the cards on when and against whom to use its chemical weapons.”

    Assad gave “himself carte blanche for resorting to chemical warfare at a time of his choosing by (saying) his government is subject to external Arab and Western aggression.”

    Indeed he’s very much threatened. Alleging he’s hyping what doesn’t exist ignores reality.

    DF cited an unnamed US military source saying Assad is “preparing to expand the Syria war into Lebanon whence his troops can threaten northern and Mediterranean areas of Israel.”

    In a Monday speech to veterans, Obama said Syria “will be held accountable by the international community and the United States should they make the tragic mistake of using those weapons.”

    Hyping fake threats conceals real ones Syria faces. Distorting comments by its officials advances the ball for war. Washington planned it years ago. Electoral politics influence its timetable. Whether it comes before or post-election doesn’t matter. Regime change policy remains unchanged.

    Syria Responds to Western Distortions and Deceit
    On July 23, Syria’s SANA state media headlined “Information Minister: Foreign Media and Diplomatic (Sides) Misconstrued Foreign Ministry Statement and Put it Out of Context,” saying: “Makdissi’s meaning was clear. Since early 2011, Syria’s been a battleground. Western-generated violence continues daily. International law legitimizes self-defense.”

    Syria’s in a war for survival. Its people know the stakes. They deplore becoming another Afghanistan, Iraq, or Libya. They expect their government to do what it takes to prevent it. Makdissi and other officials vow to do so. It’s their right and duty.

    Information Minister Omran al-Zoubi told Sham FM Radio about “an international campaign led by US-Israeli diplomacy under the guise of warning against alleged chemical weapons that Syria supposedly possesses, and that this campaign is part of ongoing pressure to pass an international resolution under the pretext of preserving world peace.”

    For over two decades, he added, Syria called for abolishing all regional WMDs. Israel’s open secret is well known. Its formidable nuclear, chemical, and biological arsenal poses the most significant threat.

    It has hundreds of warheads and sophisticated long-range delivery systems. It never signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT).

    It signed the 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), but didn’t ratify it. It never signed the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention (BWC). Its policy is CBW ambiguity, but worse than that.

    Analysts most familiar with Israeli strategy acknowledge that it won’t hesitate to use nuclear or other weapons to advance its regional imperium.

    Against Lebanon in 2006, Gaza during [Operation] Cast Lead, and other attacks, it used direct energy weapons, chemical and/or biological agents. Injuries and symptoms followed never before seen.

    The Palestinian Health Ministry said Israel used a new type explosive in Gaza. It contained toxins and radioactive materials. They burned and tore victims’ bodies from the inside. They also left long term deformations.

    Since the 1973 Yom Kippur War, Israel’s been using depleted uranium weapons. Washington initially supplied them. America’s military and Israel use them freely.

    They’re used in bombs, shells, missiles, and bullets. They spread deadly radiation like nuclear bombs. Vast areas get contaminated. Water, air, soil, and food become unsafe. Cancer and other disease rates soar. Locations far from target sites are affected.

    No evidence suggests Syria used WMDs of any kind or plans to except in self-defense against external aggression. Washington and Israel use them freely in all wars they wage and other belligerence.

    Fingers pointing the right way would blame them. Media scoundrels say nothing. Cheerleading war instead of forthrightly denouncing it threatens to embroil the entire region.

    Perhaps Washington, key NATO partners, and regional allies won’t be satisfied until it’s incinerated. Unless years of belligerent madness stops, end game consequences may demolish it from one end to the other.

    SL/SS

    http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2012/07/25/252722/west-plans-cw-falseflag-attack-on-syria/

Geef een reactie

Vul je gegevens in of klik op een icoon om in te loggen.

WordPress.com logo

Je reageert onder je WordPress.com account. Log uit / Bijwerken )

Twitter-afbeelding

Je reageert onder je Twitter account. Log uit / Bijwerken )

Facebook foto

Je reageert onder je Facebook account. Log uit / Bijwerken )

Google+ photo

Je reageert onder je Google+ account. Log uit / Bijwerken )

Verbinden met %s


%d bloggers liken dit: